Xenserver 6.5 (Creedence) was released today. I upgraded one of my test servers that was connected to my iStorage HA pair running 4.05 and it was fine. I copied over the multipath.conf that I was using with Xenserver 6.2 and everything was good.
Haven't run any benchmarks but performance definitely feels zippier creating VM's and doing VM migrations.
iStorage HA works fine on Xenserver 6.5 (Creedence)
-
- Posts: 205
- Joined: Thu Nov 05, 2009 5:52 pm
- Contact:
Re: iStorage HA works fine on Xenserver 6.5 (Creedence)
Thank you Sir,
We will now start work with XenServer 6.5.
We will now start work with XenServer 6.5.
KernSafe Support Team
iSCSI SAN, iSCSI Target, iSCSI initiator and related technological support.
[email protected]
iSCSI SAN, iSCSI Target, iSCSI initiator and related technological support.
[email protected]
Re: iStorage HA works fine on Xenserver 6.5 (Creedence)
May have spoken too soon. When I tested 6.5 I used an existing SR. Trying to create new SR and I'm getting some weird symptoms where I am getting errors trying to copy files from other SR's after creation and also can't attach some of my hosts. I used the same multipath.conf as in 6.2.
defaults {
polling_interval 10
max_fds 8192
user_friendly_names no
}
devices{
device {
vendor "KernSafe"
product "*"
path_checker "tur"
path_grouping_policy multibus
failback immediate
}
}
.
Also, If I have multiple targets defined they are all LUN 0, correct?
Stopped trying to create new SR. Could you guys test to see if 6.5 can create a new SR and then copy files to it?
Thanks!
defaults {
polling_interval 10
max_fds 8192
user_friendly_names no
}
devices{
device {
vendor "KernSafe"
product "*"
path_checker "tur"
path_grouping_policy multibus
failback immediate
}
}
.
Also, If I have multiple targets defined they are all LUN 0, correct?
Stopped trying to create new SR. Could you guys test to see if 6.5 can create a new SR and then copy files to it?
Thanks!
Re: iStorage HA works fine on Xenserver 6.5 (Creedence)
Never Mind. Too much going on and I had some fw rules not right.